The video discusses whether modern relationships suffer from entitlement on both sides, specifically regarding "high standards, low effort," and if people are "asking for more but offering less". One speaker believes modern relationships do suffer from entitlement.12 The conversation shifts to the role of social media in modern relationships, addressing whether a couple can be in a relationship without having each other on any social media platforms.3 Key points raised about social media and relationships include: One man stated he would prefer not to have his partner on social media, explaining that "support isn't surveillance". He noted there is a "thin line" between his partner's expectations and his content.45 One speaker believes that posting a partner on social media is "bad luck" and compared it to the "new age tattoo effect," which suggests that getting a tattoo of a partner's name is bad luck.6 Another speaker views posting a partner as "inviting negative energy" because a relationship is supposed to be for the couple.7 Another speaker argued that if a person has a social media page, their partner should not be "non-existent" on it. They suggested the world "sees your partner through your eyes" and that the lack of acknowledgement might look like the partner is being hidden.8910 Another perspective brought up that the outside world, including friends, can pressure a person in a relationship about why their partner isn't on their social media, even if the couple is "fine" and "happy".11 A speaker claimed that a person's actions affect how their partner looks to other people, and part of respect is how a partner is presented.12 One person stated that when she sees a man with a girlfriend who doesn't post her, she wonders if he's "hiding" his commitment or "trying to still keep space for the girls that he possibly has interest in".13 It was agreed that a person is not obligated to post their partner, even if they are married. However, one speaker argued that partnership involves taking the other person into consideration.1415 One person concluded that social media can be "very detrimental to relationships," and that even the small decision of whether to post a partner can affect the "longevity" of the relationship.16 The discussion then moved to the topic of sharing location with a partner: One speaker claimed that a partner gives their location for the sake of "safety," not to "surveil them". They argued that checking a location "for absolutely no reason" is a violation of privacy.1718 Another speaker disagreed, stating they have a lot of friends' locations because they are "nosy". They insisted they are not penalized for using the location for reasons other than safety and advised that a partner should be "transparent" about checking the location ahead of time.1920 A speaker noted that men often feel that a partner asking about their location for a random reason feels like an accusation.21 Another speaker argued that being questioned about location might not be a worry if a person has "nothing to hide".22 One speaker stated they do not have to answer for "every single place I go," and once they tell their partner they are going out, they don't have time to answer "100 questions".23 A final viewpoint suggested that sharing location is acceptable for a "safety concern" but not for feeding the "bottomless hole that is insecurity and lack of trust, surveillance and control".24