Search

    Select Website Language

    GDPR Compliance

    We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

    Immigration advocates welcome court ruling striking down Trump’s visa ban on Caribbean countries

    1 hour ago

    3

    0

    👍 ❤️ 😂 😮 😢 😡

    Caribbean immigration advocates in New York have welcomed a United States Federal District Court ruling striking down the Trump administration’s indefinite suspension of immigrant visa processing for nationals of 75 countries, including some in the Caribbean. US District Judge Jeannette Vargas in the Southern District of New York, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, ruled on Friday, Aug. 21, in favor of the plaintiffs in CLINIC v. Rubio, stating that the Trump administration’s policy was “contrary to law and in excess of statutory authority.”  Murad Awawdeh, president and CEO of the New York Immigration Coalition (NYIC), an umbrella advocacy organization of over 200 immigrant and refugee groups in New York State, told Caribbean Life on Saturday, Aug. 22, that, “by siding with the plaintiffs, the court restores the long-standing immigration process that ensures visas are issued on a case-by-case basis, not decided by nationality.  “The court called the administration’s actions what they were: illegal,” Awawdeh said. “Maintaining objectivity in immigration matters means ensuring that decisions, evaluations and representations are neutral, evidence-based, and free from personal bias or politics, so they serve the integrity of the legal process and the best interests of the parties involved.  “This ruling means that a mother in Brooklyn can go back to planning for being reunited with a daughter that she has been waiting years to hold,” he added. “This is a victory for fairness, justice and all the families who were separated by this discriminatory policy.” Awawdeh said CLINIC’s legal case was provoked by Trump’s policy in pausing all immigrant visa issuance to 75 countries, including many in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, the Middle East and Eastern Europe.  “The Trump administration cited concerns about these immigrants becoming ‘public charge’ risks, and expanded its definition of ‘public charge’ to include any public benefit used, even though most visa applicants are not eligible for cash welfare and remain ineligible for years,” Awawdeh said.  Judge Vargas ruled that Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the son of Cuban migrants residing in Miami, Florida, exceeded his power by issuing the policy that “runs afoul” of the Immigration and Nationality Act. She wrote that the refusal of visas to eligible applicants did not have “any basis in law,” ruling that the US Congress “imbued” consular officers with “exclusive authority and discretion to determine if an immigrant is eligible for a visa based upon review of specific and detailed criteria set forth in the statute. “The policy, which categorically prohibits the issuance of immigrant visas based upon the nationality of the applicant, represents a direct abrogation of this statutory scheme,” Judge Vargas added.  One of the plaintiffs, Anna Gallagher — the executive director of CLINIC, a non-profit organization that provides training, resources and support to a national network of immigration legal service providers — hailed Judge Vargas’s ruling.  “We welcome this ruling because, at its heart, this case is about keeping families together,” she said in a statement. “Catholic social teaching calls us to uphold the dignity of every person and recognize the family as the foundation of society. “This decision affirms both those values and the rule of law, allowing families to once again move forward toward reunification,” Gallagher added.  Diana Konate — deputy executive director for policy and advocacy at the nonprofit, Harlem-headquartered African Communities Together, another plaintiff — described Judge Vargas’s ruling as “a tremendous victory for the rule of law. “This unlawful and racist ban caused immeasurable harm, cruelly keeping families and loved ones apart,” she also said in a statement. “Today, we are elated to tell our community members: this ban is no more.” In February, the US Department of State said that “President Trump has made clear that immigrants must be financially self-sufficient and not be a financial burden to Americans.   “The Department of State is undergoing a full review of all screening and vetting policies to ensure that immigrants from high-risk countries do not unlawfully utilize welfare in the United States or become a public charge,” it said.  Effective Jan. 21, 2026, the Department of State said it paused all visa issuances to immigrant visa applicants who are nationals of several countries.  They comprised the following Caribbean countries: Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Cuba, Dominica, Grenada, Haiti, Jamaica, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.  Other countries were: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, , Belarus, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Colombia, Cote d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, The Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Republic of the Congo, Russia, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan and Yemen.  At the time, the State Department said “no immigrant visas have been revoked as part of this guidance,” and that the pause was “specifically for immigrant visa applicants.  “Tourist visas are nonimmigrant visas and are not affected,” it said. But, earlier this month, the San Diego, California-based Haitian Bridge Alliance (HBA) strongly condemned the expansion of the US Visa Bond Program, warning that it discriminatorily impacts Caribbean and other immigrants.  HBA Executive Director Guerline Jozef told Caribbean Life that the policy requires certain B-1/B-2 visa applicants to post financial bonds ranging from US$5,000 to US$20,000 as a condition of entry.  While presented as a visa compliance measure, Jozef said that the policy creates “a wealth-based barrier to lawful travel and raises serious concerns regarding fairness, transparency and discrimination.  “By conditioning mobility on the ability to produce thousands of dollars upfront, the policy disproportionately impacts individuals from countries facing economic hardship and humanitarian challenges,” she said. “This policy is discriminatory in both its design and its practical impact.  “Access to lawful travel should not depend on whether an individual can afford a substantial financial bond,” Jozef added. “This creates a system where mobility is determined by wealth rather than eligibility.  “The financial burden of this policy is especially concerning given economic realities in the United States,” she continued. “Millions of Americans lack sufficient savings to cover unexpected expenses as low as US$500.00, and a similar requirement imposed on US travelers abroad would place international travel out of reach for many.  She said while the US Department of State has not issued a final list of countries subject to the expanded program, the initial Visa Bond Pilot Program provides insight into its potential impact.  Jozef said the countries included in the pilot program were concentrated in Africa and other regions with predominantly Black and brown populations, “raising serious concerns about disparate impact and the use of nationality-based classifications in immigration policy.” She noted that those lists have grown to include approximately 50 countries, with a significant concentration in Africa, as well as nations in Latin America, the Caribbean, and parts of Asia. Jozef said countries added in recent updates include, among others, Ethiopia, Lesotho Mozambique, and several other African and Global South nations, alongside select countries in Latin America and Asia.  “The geographic pattern is clear: the policy overwhelmingly impacts countries with majority Black and brown populations,” she said. “This policy cannot be separated from its impact. When a policy disproportionately burdens communities of color around the world, it demands greater transparency, accountability and review.”  Jozef further warned that the Visa Bond Program raises “significant concerns” under the US Administrative Procedure Act (APA), including whether the government has provided adequate justification, established transparent selection criteria, or considered less restrictive alternatives.  Therefore, Jozef said HBA urges the State Department to suspend implementation of the Visa Bond Program pending further review; provide transparent criteria for country selection and application; assess the policy’s disparate impacts on affected communities; and ensure visa policies uphold “fairness, due process and equal treatment.”  Jozef also urged the US Congress to exercise its oversight authority by organizing a hearing on this matter; restrict funding through appropriations for the execution of this program; introduce legislation that would limit the Secretary of State’s authority to impose nationality-based financial burdens; and direct the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct an independent review of the Visa Bond Program’s “effectiveness, legality and disparate impact.”  The State Department said the Visa Bond Program “finalizes the temporary final rule that went into effect on Aug. 20, 2025, which launched a 12-month long Visa Bond Pilot Program (Pilot Program), and establishes a permanent visa bond program.   “An alien applying for a visa as a temporary visitor for business or pleasure (B-1/B-2) may be required to submit a bond (visa bond) to ensure that the alien maintains his or her nonimmigrant status and departs as required,” it said.  “Consular officers may require covered nonimmigrant visa applicants to post a bond of up to US$20,000 as a condition of visa issuance, as determined by the consular officers,” the State Department added.  It said the final rule authorizes consular officers to “require the posting of a bond by an alien applying for, and otherwise eligible to receive, a business visitor/tourist (B-1/B-2) visa to insure that at the expiration of the time for which such alien has been admitted, or upon failure to maintain the status under which [the alien] was admitted, or to maintain any status subsequently acquired, such alien will depart from the United States.”   The State Department said the 2025 visa bond pilot, which provided a framework for it, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of the Treasury to assess the feasibility of administering a visa bond program, “has provided sufficient data to suggest that a visa bond program is an effective tool for enforcing compliance among bonded visa holders.” Under the program, the State Department said visa bonds may be required from certain business/pleasure (B1/B-2) visa applicants who are nationals of countries with “high overstay rates, deficient information sharing, insufficient identity verification and criminal records, and that need improvement in the area of screening and vetting and the security of travel and civil documents, including in the granting of citizenship.”  The State Department said it will announce the covered countries no fewer than 15 days before the program takes effect. It said nationals of countries that are subject to a visa bond requirement under the Visa Bond Pilot Program will continue to be subject to a visa bond requirement pursuant to this rule on its effective date.   It said the countries may be modified on “a rolling basis, with removal effective immediately upon the removal date. “By its design and intention, the program is a tool of diplomacy, intended to encourage foreign governments to take immediate action to reduce the overstay rates by encouraging their nationals to comply with US immigration laws, improve information sharing to address insufficient identity verification and criminal records, and to encourage countries to improve screening and vetting and the security of travel and civil documents, including in the granting of citizenship,” the State Department stressed.  “As such, the rule properly is described as a key pillar of the president’s foreign policy to protect the United States from the clear national security threat posed by visa overstays and deficient screening and vetting,” it added.  In May, the Department of State identified Antigua and Barbuda, Cuba, Dominica and Grenada as Caribbean countries needing visa bonds.  The full list of countries and implementation dates for the visa bonds are in parentheses: Algeria (Jan. 21, 2026); Angola (Jan. 21, 2026); Antigua and Barbuda (Jan. 21, 2026); Bangladesh (Jan. 21, 2026); Benin (Jan. 21, 2026); Bhutan (Jan. 1, 2026); Botswana (Jan. 1, 2026); Burundi (Jan. 21, 2026); Cabo Verde (Jan. 21, 2026); Cambodia (April 2, 2026); Central African Republic (Jan. 1, 2026); Cote D’Ivoire (Jan. 21, 2026); Cuba (Jan. 21, 2026); Djibouti (Jan. 21, 2026); Dominica (Jan. 21, 2026); Ethiopia (April 2, 2026); Fiji (Jan. 21, 2026); Gabon (Jan. 21, 2026); The Gambia (Oct. 11, 2025); Georgia (April 2, 2026); Grenada (April 2, 2026); Guinea (Jan. 1, 2026); Guinea-Bissau (Jan. 1, 2026); and Kyrgyz Republic (Jan. 21, 2026). The others are: Lesotho (April 2, 2026); Malawi (August 20, 2025); Mauritania (October 23, 2025); Mauritius (April 2, 2026); Mongolia (April 2, 2026); Mozambique (April 2, 2026); Namibia (Jan. 1, 2026); Nepal (Jan. 21, 2026); Nicaragua (April 2, 2026); Nigeria (Jan. 21, 2026); Papua New Guinea (April 2, 2026); Sao Tome and Principe (Oct. 23, 2025); Senegal (Jan. 21, 2026); Seychelles (April 2, 2026); Tajikistan (Jan. 21, 2026); Tanzania (Oct. 23, 2025); Togo (Jan. 21, 2026); Tonga (Jan. 21, 2026); Tunisia (April 2, 2026); Turkmenistan (Jan. 1, 2026); Tuvalu (Jan. 21, 2026); Uganda (Jan. 21, 2026); Vanuatu (Jan. 21, 2026); Venezuela (Jan. 21, 2026); Zambia (Aug. 20, 2025); and Zimbabwe (Jan. 21, 2026).  The Government of Antigua and Barbuda said Prime Minister Gaston Browne had written to President Trump as it sought review of US visa restrictions and visa bond measures.  The Antiguan Government said it had initiated two further diplomatic representations to the Government of the United States following the publication by the Department of State of the final rule establishing a permanent Visa Bond Program. At the same time, the Embassy of Antigua and Barbuda in Washington, D.C., had submitted a formal Diplomatic Note to the United States Department of State for the attention of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, requesting an early review of Antigua and Barbuda's continued inclusion in these measures, the Antigua and Barbudan Government said.  “The Government's representations are based upon the Department of State's own explanation of the objectives of the Visa Bond Program, published in the Final Rule in the Federal Register,” it said.  The Government of Antigua and Barbuda said it had “responded positively and constructively” to each of the State Department’s objectives. The statement said that, among the measures highlighted in Brown’s letter and the Diplomatic Note were the strengthening by legislation of the residency requirements under Antigua and Barbuda's Citizenship by Investment Program; the establishment of biometric cooperation with the United States Department of Homeland Security to enhance identity verification and screening; and ⁠Antigua and Barbuda's continuing full cooperation with United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement in accepting promptly the return of its nationals who are lawfully removed from the United States. Prime Minister Brown’s letter also pointed out ⁠Antigua and Barbuda's willingness to cooperate with the United States regarding third-country nationals within the limits of its national capacity.  “The Government has also reminded the United States that Antigua and Barbuda has historically maintained a visa overstay rate of little more than 1%, that no citizen of Antigua and Barbuda has sought refugee status in the United States, and that the country remains a stable parliamentary democracy recognized by the World Bank as an upper-middle-income economy,” it said. 
    Click here to Read More
    • Share:
    Caribbean Airlines to discontinue Trinidad-Tobago-Barbados service
    Previous Article
    Caribbean Airlines to discontinue Trinidad-Tobago-Barbados service
    Next Article
    CLACC-C Youth Pan Fest set for Aug. 29
    CLACC-C Youth Pan Fest set for Aug. 29

    Related Diaspora Updates:

    Are you sure? You want to delete this comment..! Remove Cancel

    Comments (0)

      Leave a comment

      Send